A. Requirements
No prerequisites are required for this
course. However, preference is given to those students enrolled in the High Technology Law Program.
Additionally, this course is open to students with all levels of computer
proficiency. If you do not have any prior background in using the Internet,
you should sign up for a training session with Gina Doherty, Director of
the Law
School
's
Computer
Resource
Center
. If you need to brush
up on your LEXIS or Westlaw skills, you are strongly encouraged to sign up
for a refresher training session prior to the week of the course in which
those aspects are studied.
B. Reading Assignments
You will have reading assignments for each
class. Please read the assigned materials and be prepared to actively
discuss them with the class. The reading assignments for each week are
detailed in the course syllabus. Additionally, be sure to hand in the class
assignments as detailed in the course syllabus.
C. Class Participation
Many of you have extensive computer
backgrounds and knowledge. The instructors will be the discussion leaders,
but all students are strongly encouraged to participate in the class
discussions. As a seminar, this course is designed to be a collective
learning experience.
D. Class Projects
Students will divide into groups of two or three
and the groups will select a topic. (No two groups may select the same
project, so select several topics as alternatives.) The group will decide
which two students will participate in the panel discussion, which student
will present a business plan and which student presents the group's web
site.
Each project will
consist of:
a) A website based on the group's primary topic. Some hypotheticals explore ancillary areas of law, but stick to the main topic. The website will have an explanation of the topic in layman's terms in addition to links to other online resources. The explanation should provide enough information for a reader to understand the background and potential legal hurdles of the topic. All three students will work on the project. One student from the group will present the web site to the class. Websites should be limited to no more than three pages. Websites should be limited to no more
than three pages.
b) A panel discussion on the group's topic. Each member of the group will discuss their opposing views based on the paper topic selected. For example, if the group chose the 'Spam' paper topic, one student would be the sender and one would be the recipient. If the group chose the 'Professional Responsibility' paper topic, one student would be the attorney and the other student would represent the injured client. Each student in the panel discussion will present their views for ten minutes. Use of Powerpoint as a presentation tool is highly encouraged. The two students in the group should work together to provide an introduction and background to the topic so that their discussions are not redundant.
c) A business plan for an e-commerce start up. Both students are to work together devising a business plan. One student will assume the role of CEO of a dot-com and present the plan via the web and/or a Powerpoint presentation. The other student will walk thru the website and product offering(s). The presentation should address the questions raised below. Since some students may be representing e-commerce start ups, they should put themselves in the entrepreneur's shoes and create a business plan. The business plan should be two to three pages in length. Again, the group will submit written answers to the following questions and present for ten minutes each:
Key business strategy:
1) Product(s) and or
Service(s);
2) Target market -
demographics;
3) Geographic focus;
4) Start-up capital
/ resource requirements;
5) Potential sources
of start-up capital?
6) Source(s) of
revenue / profit (i.e. - actual product sales, advertising);
7) Marketing
strategy - how will you generate awareness of your site / product?
8) Current and
potential competition;
9) What sets your
site / products apart from the competition;
10) Long term
revenue, growth, and product plan - i.e. - 6 months, 1 year, 5 years.
E. Research
Paper
1. Overview of Research
Paper Guidelines
Although this course does not fulfill the
law school's writing requirement, the substantive paper counts for a
significant portion of your grade. The goal of your research paper is to
state and respond to specific questions, or set of questions, that relate
to an issue involving cyberspace law. Listed below in the next section, are sixteen fact
patterns with corresponding questions. Each paper must be individually written
and submitted.
You should select a fact
pattern, which enables you to do an extensive analysis that can be discussed
in ten double spaced pages. Answering the questions associated with each
fact pattern may prove to be difficult at first, but the exercise is
similar to the experience that you have when writing briefs, memoranda of
law, etc. (As a general matter, choose a topic of interest to you, not
necessarily what you think will interest your instructors.)
Approach your paper assignment
with the same analytical perspective as an exam. We would rather see a well
researched ten page paper with cogent analysis than a twenty page paper
that just lists case after case but has no analysis. There are no right or
wrong answers, but back up your work with in depth research including
cases, law review articles, online source, federal materials, news stories,
etc. Use as much case law as you can, and be sure to articulate different
legal analysis where appropriate (i.e. Analogies, Characterizations, Facts
and Meaning, etc.) Also, if you find cases that oppose your point of view,
incorporate them into your analysis and explain why these are some of the
hurdles you or your client might face or how the ruling would not apply to
this particular case. Perhaps you can craft a novel argument if all case
law has been against you.
All sources must be footnoted
(not end notes) in Bluebook format. Feel free to fully use the footnotes
for parenthetical explanations and slight digressions. Do not ignore the
business perspective if it is appropriate. If there is an obvious business
solution that would save a client from litigation, suggest it in addition
to your legal analysis. Some of the questions hint at potential business
solutions. Also, do not forget to tie your analysis back into the fact
pattern
2. Selecting a
Topic for the Research Paper
After each group selects a
topic, each member of the group should choose one of the questions to
answer within their respective paper. Every student should answer a
different question. No more than one group can select each fact pattern, so
pick several alternatives. Select one of the topics below:
Antitrust
"Coopetition"
is the new paradigm in business. The Internet has spawned a new type of
environment wherein competitors work together on some projects and compete
on others. Yohoo, a successful search engine,
supports itself through advertising. Yohoo
currently receives 15% of world wide search engine traffic. Likeus is a search engine similar to Yohoo, except they use different search logic and
provide an alternative venue for web surfers. Likeus
has a 10% share of search engine traffic. The CEOs of Likeus
and Yohoo meet at a search engine conference and
decide that coopetition is the way to go. They
provide links to each other's web sites and give reduced rates to
advertisers who place banner ads on both search engines.
Several other search engines who also use their own unique search logic, Altervisitor, and Webwiggler,
among a few others, contact Likeus and ask to be
a part of their "coopetition"
agreement. Soon 10 search engines, which represent 70% of web traffic,
provide links to each other's sites and have reduced joint advertising
prices for advertisers who advertise on all 10 sites. Another popular
search engine, Websnail, notices that its traffic
has decreased since the 10 other sites created their coopetition
agreement. Some advertisers have stopped advertising on Websnail,
telling them that they can get a better price by advertising on the other
10 search engines at once. Websnail received 10%
of search engine traffic before the coopetition agreement,
now they get about 5%. The remaining 20 other search engines get the
remaining 25% of search engine traffic. Websnail
approached Likeus to let them know that they were
interested in being a part of the coopetition
agreement, but Likeus said that Websnails search algorithms were too dated to provide
any additional value.
Other regular advertisers on Websnail are threatening to stop advertising unless Websnail can become a part of the coopetition
agreement and traffic is diminishing. Websnail
wants to take legal action because they suspect the other search engines
may be violating the antitrust laws.
a) You are the in
house counsel for Websnail. How do you craft your
argument that the other search engines are violating antitrust laws? What
would you have to prove? How does e-commerce complicate traditional case
law? Would proving the share of banner ad revenue be of any help, or should
you just focus on the percent of traffic? How would you define the market?
What type of recourse would be appropriate? Since the Internet is world
wide, could your European office take any action based on article 85 or 86
of the European Union Treaty (Maastricht
)?
b) Your firm
represents the search engine Likeus. How would
you defend your self against an antitrust suit? Would traditional case law
be of any help or would you have to create a novel argument? How would you
define the market? What are the possibility implications if the judge rules
against you? How can you defend yourself against the potential suit under
article 85 or 86 of the European Union Treaty (Maastricht
), since you do
have a European subsidiary?
c) You are an
attorney for the Department of Justice and want to break apart the coopetition agreement. What case law supports your
argument? How would you define the market? What are the risks of letting
the coopetition agreement continue? What action
can you take against the group? What further information might you need to
make your case?
Copyright / Trademarks Online
Skip Howell is a die-hard Gilligan’s
Island
fan.He
spends most of his spare time devoted to his web site “Gilligan.com.”On
the fan page he features pictures from the show as well as a server that houses
various clips of his favorite episodes which can be access through a
Gillian-only search engine on hissite.The
clips play through streaming media and appear on a 2x2 inch portion of the screen.Skip
is also proud that he provides an online forum at his web site for other
Gilligan fans where they post portions of scripts from their favorite episodes
and add commentary.Skip
automatically edits the submissions for profanity, but does not go through the
forum manually.The site also features links to other Gillian’s Island fan sites.To support the expense of hosting the site, Skip has several affiliate
advertisements on the site, which pay him a nominal amount every time someone
clicks on them.The affiliate revenue covers the cost of his high speed telephone line and hosting
services, but does not create any profit.Additionally, Skip sells copies of his
‘little buddy’ key chain on the web site – a stick figure on a key chain with a
red sweater and white sun hat.While it does not bear Gilligan’s face, many people who have seen the show will
recognize it as Gilligan.Skip has yielded a token profit of about $500 annually from his little buddy key
chains, although he claims that demand is growing.
a) You are a solo practitioner who plays golf with
Bob Denver, the actor who played
Gilligan.Bob was upset when he learned of Skip’s site and was confident that Skip must be
breaking the law and must be stopped.Bob came to you looking for advice.He has the following claims:
-
Skip can’t use the Gilligan image without permission – the pictures must be removed and the film clips have to be stopped.
- Bob wrote some of the scripts and deserves a royalty for the portions that are posted on Skip’s site.
- Surely only Bob has the right to ‘Gilligan.com.’ and there must be a way to stop him from using the domain name.
- Even though the ‘little buddy’ key chain does not bear his face, they are exploiting his character and shouldn’t be used without permission.
How do you address Bob’s claims and what causes of action
do you propose.How likely are they to succeed?Are there any other claims that you might be able to make?What defenses do you anticipate from Skip and do any of them diminish your
claims?Is there a non-litigious solution to this dispute?
b) You are an attorney representing
Skip.Skip comes into your office and tells you about Bob Denver’s claims (above). While
he has not received a formal complaint, he has learned through the grapevine of
the four areas of contention.How do you advise him regarding the merits of the potential?Are there other possible claims?What
defenses does he have?Is there a way you might be able to help solve this before going to court?
c) (A&B do not have to address the situation
below) You are in house counsel for Skip’s Internet Service Provider (ISP),
3hourtour.net.As an ISP, you usually do not bother with the content of your
client’s
sites.However, you received a request by Bob’s
attorney to take down Gilligan.com on the basis of a claim against the domain
name and the potentially infringing content on the site in addition to
infringing product being sold.You are also told that if you can not take the site down immediately, please to
deactivate the external links leading to other Gilligan’s Island fan sites,
since they also may contain infringing materials.Additionally, you are asked to take down
the affiliate advertisement links as well.You send Bob’s attorney a response acknowledging the letter and letting him know
that you will first invite a response from Skip before taking down or modifying
his web site.While it would be easy to give into Bob’s attorney’s request, your ISP prides itself
on customer service and is willing to invest the resources to fully investigate
the situation.If you refuse to yield to Bob’s attorney’s request, what causes of actions might
he have against you as an ISP.What defenses do you have?Are there any recent cases or disputes that provide some insight?(Focus on ISP
issues, but if you find insufficient material for your paper, feel free to
leverage off of the following questions) You want to create an amicable
solution to the dispute – what portion of Skip’s site might be legally
problematic and why? What portion of Bob’s claim might not be valid and why?
How would you suggest Skip and Bob resolve the dispute?
Cyber-terrorist Liability / Security
Iona Modem is an ex-patriot
from the republic
of
Sloberia
(in Eastern Europe
) living in the United States
. Iona
loves the U.S.
, but misses her
home country and regularly contributes to the local Sloberian
charity, the Sloberian Library Underwriter's
Mission (SLUM). Through SLUM's web site, Iona
can get regular
updates of the charity's activities in her homeland and make additional
contributions with her credit card. SLUM is a legitimate and registered
charitable organization and regularly accepts donations online, which it
promptly and appropriately distributes. Like most charitable organizations,
SLUM operates on a shoestring budget, allowing it to pass more funds on to
the needy. Consequently, SLUM is staffed primarily by volunteers and a core
staff of underpaid yet dedicated employees. A generous donor did provide
SLUM with a computer and software to act as a firewall and the same
computer also hosts the web site, processes transactions, and stores
records. The SLUM server has packet filtering, but nobody designated any
level of protection for the ports. A volunteer monitors the web site a few
times a day during the work week and transmits bank data to process
donations weekly.
Mac Kaput is part of the Sloberian Liberation Imperial Marxist Enterprise
(SLIME). He deeply resents the current government in Sloberia
and any entity that supports them. SLIME has targeted SLUM and other
organizations for their counter-revolutionary activities. Mac is an
accomplished hacker and SLIME orders him to disrupt SLUM's
activities through online channels. On a Saturday, Mac commandeers one of
the few operating phone lines in Sloberia and
promptly programs a Denial of Service attack (DNS) which overwhelms SLUM's server and renders the site unusable for a
while. He is pleased to discover that the web site is not well protected
and after some clever digging, Mac is able to log directly onto SLUM's server. On the server he finds the names,
addresses, telephone numbers, e-mail addresses, credit card numbers and the
amount donated to SLUM, which he promptly posts online for all to see. Mac
also changes the web site to show only pro SLIME messages.
Mac's handiwork is discovered
when the SLUM offices reopen on Monday and they quickly fix the pro SLIME
messages. The volunteers do not realize that MAC found and transmitted
personal data until several upset donors call later in the week. Iona
immediately began
receiving hate-SPAM and some very obnoxious telephone calls. When she
finally receives her credit card bill, there were over $3,000 in suspicious
charges, including several purchases from Fredericks
and debits to an
online gambling site.
a) You are Iona
Modem. Your credit card company immediately credits you for the
unauthorized purchases, but you are still plagued by overwhelming hate-SPAM
and harassing calls by someone with a Sloberian
accent. What recourse do you have against SLUM? Was their security
adequate? How does their status as a charity potentially limit your
recovery? While Iona
probably can not trace Mac as the cause
of her difficulties, he clearly left behind the 'calling card' of SLIME.
How much recourse would Iona
have against
SLIME in a U.S.
court? What are
some of the difficulties that she might face?
b) You are outside
counsel for SLUM. How can you protect yourself against Iona
's lawsuit. Are there any other non-litigious remedies that
you can employ to minimize your client's potential liability? Does SLUM's status as a charity help their situation? What
causes of action would you have against SLIME and what difficulties might
you face in getting them to a U.S.
court or
collecting judgment?
c) You are a legal
aid attorney representing Mac Kaput. Mac was nabbed while price switching
bulk toilet paper at a Costco in New Jersey
. During the
investigation, he cracked under pressure and some hints of his involvement
with the SLUM hacking came to light. Focusing strictly on the Internet law
related issues, what defenses can he raise against Iona
and SLUM, even if
there is evidence directly linking him with the hack attack and subsequent
private data posting? Should the local court be able to assert jurisdiction
over Mac for his activities thousands of miles away? Aside from his
confession, how difficult could it be to prove that he initiated the
attack?
Financial Privacy (2 party case)
Gramm
Leach is sick of
the high fees of his local bank. He decides to find an online bank that
does not have transaction fees, account maintenance fees, and ATM fees.
After some searching, Gramm settles on
Delaware
based Bliley
bank, which claims to have fee free banking online. Bliley bank has the
usual terms and conditions to open an account. At the bottom of the terms
is a tiny privacy and copyright link. The privacy link leads to a standard
privacy policy, including Bliley's pledge not to disclose personal
information to third parties without permission. At the bottom of the
policy is a note that states "this policy is subject to change without
notice at any time." Gramm clicks through the
basic terms and conditions, submits his personal information, including his
social security number, hits the "accept" button, and transfers
$500 to the online bank.
A week later, Gramm starts receiving very personalized unsolicited
e-mail from several companies, including offers for credit cards that have
his social security number already filled in. A mutual fund company owned
by Bliley bank regularly calls Gramm as well.
Soon he also receives notice that someone had tried to apply for credit
using his social security number and a forged signature. Gramm is a not the type of person to disclose his
personal information to anyone and he quickly suspects that Bliley bank is
the source.
Upon returning to their web
site, Gramm discovers that the privacy policy has
been modified. The policy now says that Bliley bank does not charge any
fees, since they generate revenue by sharing or selling personal
information to carefully selected third parties. Depositors can opt-out,
but the harm has already been done - Gramm's
personal information was disclosed to multiple third parties.
Bliley used FlyByNyte
marketing to carefully select third parties to buy personal information. FlyByNyte's careful selection process screened out
anyone who couldn't pay the asking price. All others were accepted. Bliley
did inform FlyByNyte that the personal
information should be carefully protected, but did not follow up or monitor
their activities.
a) You are Gramm's attorney. What causes of action do you have
against Bliley? Do any recent federal statutes support your faces. Does the fact that Bliley bank used FlyByNyte help or hurt their defense? Should they be
permitted to modify their privacy policy without notice? Is Bliley liable
for any unlawful abuse of Gramm's personal data?
What would you ask for in terms of damages?
b) You are in house
counsel for Bliley. What causes of action do you anticipate Gramm asserting and what defenses do you have. Do you
anticipate any difficulties with federal law? Are you liable for the
unauthorized use of Gramm's personal data? You
may have some causes of action against FlyByNyte,
but discover that they are almost bankrupt. Can you minimize your liability
since you used them to manage the resale of customer data? Any suggestions
to try to resolve the case and minimize negative publicity. What would you
advise Bliley to do in the future to minimize liability of this type?
Free Speech
Andy Anarchy is a 15 year old
high school student who has some issues with 'the establishment.' Andy has
taken to the web in order to express his opinions and meet other people to
discuss ideas. One of Andy's teachers, Connie Conservative, expresses
substantially different views during class. Andy is convinced that she
doesn't like him because of his nose ring or the various tattoos on his
arm. Connie and Andy get into a heated debate during a discussion of Catcher
in the Rye
. Andy is certain
that J.D. Salinger inserted a subtle anti-proletariat theme throughout the
book and the establishment keeps the book on the syllabus to oppress his
causes. After class, Andy wants to get back at Connie and posts his opinion
about her on his web site "www.radicaldude.com." On his web site
he writes that Connie is a big meanie and she
must be stopped, no matter what the cost. He posts a message on his site
advocating a massive Cliff Notes burning in front of the school the next week.
Although he would never admit it, Andy is probably the only person who ever
visits "radicaldude.com." He has not used any meta-tags nor
registered with any search engines. Later that week, Andy decides to let
Connie know how he feels and put a post-it on her gradebook
that says "go to www.radicaldude.com." Connie does visit the site.
a) You are Connie
and you visit Andy's web site. You find the content threatening and
defaming, since no one wants to find a web site that calls them a big meanie. You are also troubled by his call for a Cliff
Notes burning at school later that week. What legal cause of action do you
have against Andy to try to get him to stop posting comments about you? Is
his threat that you must be stopped at any cost actionable? Do you expect
any constitutional objections?
b) You are the
school superintendent. Connie has told you that she wants Andy expelled for
the content of his web site. How do you balance the constitutional rights
of Andy and Connie? What can you do about Andy's call for the Cliff Notes
burning? What is the potential liability to the school? Is there anything
that you can do to amicably resolve the dispute?
c) You are Andy and
are surprised that Connie is upset by the content of your web site. Your
parents appreciate your radical cause and hire a lawyer to help you after
school. What defenses do you have if Connie brings suit. Do you have any
potential liability for the content of the web site? Can you defend yourself
against the threatened expulsion? You did not expect that people would take
the site so seriously. Is there anything that you can do to help resolve
the dispute?
Internet Access at Work
Pete Postal is a government
employee who has a computer at his desk. Pete wants to advance in his
career and enrolls in an after work degree program. The government agency
actively encourages employees to advance themselves and helps fund the
tuition for the program. One of his required courses is human sexuality.
Pete decides to do some of his homework after working hours on his computer
at work, after everyone else has gone home. He finds that the Internet is a
great way to do his research and gets most of the materials that he needs
to complete his assignment.
The next day, Nellie Nosie noticed some of the things that Pete downloaded
from the Internet and accidentally left on the printer. The print out that Nellie
found consisted of clinical text about tests conducted on a former
presidential candidate. All graphics were simple black and white diagrams.
Nellie immediately brought the documents to Pete's boss, who fired him for
abusing the Internet at work and downloading what Nellie thought was
pornography.
a) You are a
taxpayer who heard about Pete's Internet fiasco and wants to know what
employees are doing with taxpayer money? You want
a copy of the Internet cache and history files of each employee to see where
they have been and also copies of e-mail. Discuss the reach of the freedom
of information act and how it applies to electronic media used in
government workplaces. Do government employees have any expectation of
privacy for their electronic files?
b) You are Pete who
is now out of a job, just a few years before earning a pension. Do any
cases support the privacy of your electronic files or use of the Internet
at work? Can you be fired for using the Internet after working hours,
especially considering that there was no policy forbidding it? Can you
block a taxpayer's freedom of information act request looking for your
cache and history files?
c) You are the
governmental agency who fired Pete. Do you have to give Pete's file to the
taxpayer insisting on copies based on the freedom of information act? Can
you fire an employee for using the Internet after working hours? Could Pete
still be fired if he did not leave anything on the printer and his online
use was discovered through a review of the log in the I.S. department? What
policy would you devise for the future to balance the needs of your
employees with your business needs?
Jurisdiction
Murray and Ogden have had
enough of New England
skiing and want to try the white powder
of Utah
. They search the
Internet and find an online travel agent who specializes in ski vacations
outside of New England
. While surfing the online travel
agent's web site they find a link to a resort in
Bountiful
Utah
, just outside of
Salt Lake City
. The resort's web
site is a virtual brochure, with colorful pictures and descriptions.
Although the web site does not list prices or allow for reservations, there
is an e-mail link, allowing visitors to click and e-mail an inquiry. Aside
from the web site, the resort advertises in a few national ski magazines.
The ads are infrequent and are usually less than 1/4 page.
Massachusetts
residents account
for about four percent of the resort's annual revenue.
Ogden
is enticed by the
web site and sends an e-mail asking for rates and availability. They
confirm the reservation by phone. Within a few days, Murray and Ogden fly
out from Logan
airport for their
big Utah
skiing adventure.
The snow is not quite what they expected since it was not groomed like the
pictures on the web site. Ogden
falls on his
first run and is too sore to continue his skiing adventure and spends the
rest of his time in the hotel soaking in the hot tub.
Murray
had a great time
skiing solo, since he did not have Ogden
to slow him down.
At night, he explored the surrounding area and was delighted to find towns
named "Murray" and "Ogden." Murray
raced to a local cybercafe to register domain names to commemorate his
trip. He registered both "murray.com" and "ogden.com."
When they return home, Ogden
discovers that he
has a hairline fracture in his leg and that he will not be able to ski for
the rest of the season. Murray
, on the other
hand, has murray.com and ogden.com directed to his web site, which is
populated with pictures from the ski adventure.
a) You are
Ogden
and want to sue
the resort for negligence, since the snow was not properly groomed.
Assuming that you have a legitimate cause of action for negligence, can you
assert jurisdiction over the Utah
resort from
Massachusetts
? What does the
long-arm statute say and is this a constitutional
assertion of jurisdiction? Was the resort's web site enough to confer
jurisdiction? How about the other forms of advertising? What about the
e-mail? Does it matter that you found the resort on a link to an online
travel agency? What cases provide support for your argument and which cases
might lead the courts against you?
b) You are an
attorney representing the resort in Utah
. How can you have
Ogden
's suit dismissed for lack of
jurisdiction? What cases support your argument and can you distinguish this
situation from decisions that might be held against you? Is the web site
sufficient to meet the minimum contacts requirement? How does the national
advertising affect your defense? What can you put on the web site in the
future to try to minimize jurisdictional exposure and are
there any cases that support this?
c) You are an
attorney representing the towns of Ogden and Murray. The towns wanted to
have their own web sites and demand that Murray
transfer the
domain names that he registered. Focusing on the jurisdictional aspect, can
the towns sue Murray
from a
Utah
court? Was his
registration sufficient to confer jurisdiction? What about the fact that he
registered the domain names while he was in Utah
. Are there any
cases that support the assertion of jurisdiction? Will Murray
have a legitimate
defense since he registered the sites after his and his friend's names?
What if the domain names lead to a web site that claims to be the official
gateway to the towns of Murray and Ogden
Utah
? Are there any
business compromises that the towns can propose to avoid litigation?
Linking / Framing / Tort
Suffolk PCs requires a lot of
technical information for their e-commerce site. As quickly as they post
whatever they can find, the information changes. The technical staff just
can't support the product information demands of the web site and
purchasers are constantly sending e-mail requests for more product
information and specifications. The staff is convinced that they would not
have to deal with as many customers calling if all of the information was
online.
Tommy Tech is the manager of
the customer service department and is overwhelmed. He decides that an easy
solution is creating a frame around the technical information from other
web sites. Some of the framed sites are vendors, some are competitors.
Tommy also puts in a few links to other sites that have information.
Zipp
Dryve recently bought a computer a local store and was
having some trouble setting it up. While searching the web, he found the
Suffolk PCs web site and searched the technical information. Zipp printed out some instructions that were on the
Suffolk PCs site. The instructions were actually on www.megamonsterPCs.com,
but were framed by the Suffolk PCs site. Unfortunately for Zipp, the instructions were a little off and he
accidentally fried his motherboard, a critical piece to his computer. Zipp e-mailed Suffolk PCs and wrote that he wanted a
new computer for free or he was going to sue.
The web master at MegamonsterPCs hates when his site is linked or framed
and posted a specific "do not link" and "do not frame"
notice on all pages. He did not have time to search out those who framed or
linked to his site, but did send a request to stop anytime someone let know
of a link or frame to his site.
a) You are in house
counsel for Suffolk PCs. How do you respond to Zipp's
request? What potential causes of action might he have against you? Does it
matter that he did not buy the computer from Suffolk PCs? Is there anything
that you can put on the site to avoid this type of problem in the future?
Can you get indemnification from MegamonsterPCs,
since the bad advice came from their site? MegamonsterPCs
and a few other sites insist that you stop linking and framing their sites.
Do you have a right to continue? Is there any case law that could support
your position?
b) You are Zipp's attorney. Can you sue SuffolkPCs
for damage to the computer if they do not provide your client with a
replacement? What precedent supports your claim for their liability? What
would be the cause(s) of action? Can you also sue MegamonsterPCs?
Should companies be liable for third party links or frames and are there
any cases that help support or oppose your opinion?
c) You are the in
house attorney for MegamonsterPCs. Do you face
any liability for Zipp's computer? What are the
potential causes of action? What are your defenses? Can you join Suffolk
PCs as a party if Zipp sues you directly instead
of Suffolk PCs? What steps can you take to avoid this type of problem in
the future? If Suffolk
refuses to remove
the frame and or link, do you have any legal cause of action? Is there any
case law that might help you? Do you anticipate that they might have any
defenses?
Medical Malpractice
Bigpharma is a drug and medical
device company in
Maryland
that has created a small, remotely programmable radio frequency ID chip. The
chip has been FDA approved for implantation into transplant organs as a
fail-safe method for doctors to make sure that they are giving the right
patient the right organ. The RFID chip, “Organright,” has been successfully used for over a year at various hospitals without incident.
Bigpharma has a feedback forum on
its website, bigpharma.com, for doctors and hospitals to publicly provide
comments and exchange ideas about its various products, including Organright. Bigpharma
has a disclaimer on the feedback forum and does not monitor the postings, aside
from an automatic obscenity filter and removal of postings that are the subject
of an e-mailed complaint.
Doctor Dan is a young emergency room
surgeon who loves technology. He
is not involved in organ transplants, but stumbles on the Organright thread on
bigpharma.com and realizes that the product may have more uses. Doctor
Dan sees lots of patients in emergency situations and is often frustrated that
it may take a while to get the patients’ medical history and statistics, which
could delay care. He realizes that
the Organright chip is small enough to insert right beneath the skin of a
patients arm with local anesthetic and it would have enough space to fit a
patient’s medical history and statistics. Dr.
Dan convinces the hospital administration that this new use of Organright would
be a great benefit to some of their repeat patients, including those with
epilepsy, hemophilia, and perhaps even high-risk pregnancies.
Dozens of patients agree to have
Organright filled with their medical information put under their skin. The
patient sign standard consent forms addressing the risks of subcutaneous
insertion of a small RFID chip. Months
later, the program is deemed a success, after two patients receive lifesaving
care because their medical information was just quick scan on an RFID reader,
which can be up to 12 feet away.
Bigpharma learns of the success of
Dr. Dan’s novel use of Oranright and decides to gather some information at the
hospital. They send a marketing
assistant to sit near the entrance with a hidden RFID reader to capture patient
information as they enter and leave the hospital. After
a few days, the marketing assistant collects unencrypted RFID data on over 100
patients. Bigpharma mines the data
and decides to market its other products to the patients based on their medical
histories.
Percy patient unfortunately has a
number of medical issues that have required a few visits to the emergency room. He
has had the Organright chip put in his arm and was surprised to soon receive
marketing materials specific to his various ailments from Bigpharma.
a) You are an attorney and Percy visits your office. He
is distraught that his medical information some how got into the hands of
Bigpharma and after some discussion, you both realize that it might be related
to the Organright data. Percy
wants you to sue Dr. Dan for medical malpractice and anything else that you can
throw at him. What causes of
action might Percy have against Dr. Dan and Big Pharma and how likely is he to
proceed?
b) You represent Dr. Dan, who comes in your office with news that Percy
might sue him for medical malpractice and perhaps some other causes of action. On
what grounds could Percy sue and what defenses does Dr. Dan have? Could
Dr. Dan join Bigpharma as a party?
c) You are in-house counsel for Bigpharma and you get wind of Percy’s
potential intentions to sue your company for marketing products to him specific
to his private ailments. Could
Bigpharma be liable for their actions? Percy claims that because Bigpharma.com has postings indicating that data on Organright chips is easy to ‘Phish’ because it is
typically unencrypted, the product is defective. Does
this claim seem viable?
Online Contract & Security
Clarence Collector is an avid
music fan who is always looking for anything from his favorite group, the
Grateful Stones. Clarence often scours the online auctions for additional
8-track tapes or CDs to fill his collection. One of Clarence's favorite
auction sites, www.beaniebay.com, often carries a few hard to find albums. Beaniebay has been an easy way for Clarence to enlarge
his collection, since he can bid with his credit card number online and
wait eagerly for UPS to bring his package a few days later.
Recently, Clarence bid for a
set of cassette tapes on the Beaniebay site
advertised as "genuine unauthorized bootleg copies of the Grateful
Stones 1975 reunion album. Clarence was thrilled a few days later when he
received an e-mail from Beaniebay letting him
know that his $60 bid was the highest one and the seller would be sending
him the merchandise after Beaniebay billed his
credit card. Corey Counterfeiter, the seller, promptly shipped the tapes to
Clarence and was credited by Beaniebay.
Sally Sneak actively monitored
the Beaniebay site with her electronic "sniffer" which could intercept and read
correspondence to and from the site. Beaniebay
had grown very quickly in popularity and never had a chance to install the
most high tech security measures. They used a security program that was
sold in stores and came with frequent upgrades. Still, Sally's sniffer was able to get by the program. Sally saw
Clarence's credit card number and decided that it would be great for some
shopping. She charged several thousand dollars worth of merchandise online
before Clarence had noticed the problem on his credit card statement. It
was not without some aggravation that he was able to have his credit card
company remove the charges except for the first $50 that Sally charged.
Clarence was not happy with the
quality of Corey's Grateful Stones album. He thought that there was too
much hiss and that it did not properly represent the tonal qualities of
1975. Clarence told his credit card company to reverse the charge, since he
shouldn't have to pay for something that is an illegal copy anyway.
a) You are Clarence.
Do you have any cause of action against Beaniebay
for having the most sophisticated security system? You did have to pay the
first $50 to your credit card company and it did waste some of your
Grateful Stones listening time. What defenses should you anticipate? Should
you have to pay for the item that you bid for, even though it was an
illegal copy? Are there any cases that support or oppose your argument?
b) You are the in
house counsel for Beaniebay. What defenses do you
have against Clarence for the security breach? Does any case law support
you? The lawyer for the Grateful Stones called and is threatening to sue
since you sold a counterfeit tape from your auction site. Do you have any
defenses? Should you be able to compel Clarence to pay for the tape that he
ordered? Do you have to credit Corey's account? What would be the basis for
your cause of action against Sally?
c) You are Corey.
Should you be able to collect your money from Beaniebay
for selling the Grateful Stones tape? You did advertise it as a genuine
bootleg copy, isn't that sufficient? Do you have a cause of action against Beaniebay? Against Clarence? The lawyer for the
Grateful Stones contacts you about selling a counterfeit tape. What are
your defenses?
Online
Gambling
Johnny Vegas starts an
online gambling site, ‘awesomeodds.com’ from his parent’s garage in
Somerville
. He incorporates his
business in Vanatu and has the server hosted in the
Bahamas
, where he has also established a bank account. Awesomeodds.com
offers online poker against real and computer opponents and virtual scratch
tickets. Johnny charges a $3 fee
per player per game for participants to play poker, plus a 3% commission on all
winnings. Johnny has adjusted the program so that players who go against the computer typically have worse odds. The
virtual scratch tickets work on the basis of a formula devised by Johnny. The
proceeds of each $5 virtual ticket go into an account. When
the account hits $200, the next ticket purchaser will win $50. With
each $1000 increment, Johnny gives the next ticket purchaser $100. The
players transfer all funds to Awesomeodds.com through Paypal, and the money is
deposited into the Bahamian account. The services sold are listed as ‘sporting event,’ on the Paypal transaction receipt.
Warren
is an avid poker player, but most of the
time he spent learning the game was during wild college parties, so
he is not a very successful player. One night he uses his credit
card to transfer $1,000 to Paypal, which he spends at
‘awesomeodds.com.’ Over
the course of the evening,
Warren
cleans out all of his $1,000 playing ‘
Texas
hold
‘em’ against other online poker players, and empties his
account.
Warren
calls his Visa card company and asks for
his account to be reimbursed, since the $1,000 was ‘illegally taken’
by an ‘illegitimate’ web site. His Visa Company refuses, and tells him that the transaction
was a legitimate transfer to Paypal, and cannot be reversed. Paypal informs him that he
can’t get his money back and needs to take it up with the web
site.
Harry Hacker is a
college student in
New York
with time on his hands. He goes
onto awesomeodds.com, tests out the back-end script engine on the scratch
tickets, and realizes that he can monitor the site to know when to buy a
winning ticket. Harry transfers
$10 through his Paypal account to awesomeodds.com and starts playing the
scratch tickets based on a script that created. With
a few hours work, he wins $550, gets the money transferred back to his Paypal
account, and cashes out.
a) You represent
Johnny. He figures out
what Harry did and wants to get his money back from Harry. Does Johnny have any civil
remedies and could he alert law enforcement about what Harry did,
hoping that they’d pursue criminal remedies? You mention to Johnny that
his approach might backfire, since there may be some criminal
penalties for running a gambling site. What state or federal crimes
could Johnny be liable for and how might he defend himself?
b) You represent
Harry. Harry gets word
that Johnny might pursue civil or criminal remedies against
him. What causes of
action could Johnny have and what would be Harry’s defenses? If Harry wanted to stir
trouble and he alerted federal or state authorities about Johnny’s
site, what causes of action might they pursue and what would his
defenses be?
c) You are an
attorney representing
Warren
. Can he invalidate his
transaction and get his money back from awesomeodds.com, his Paypal
account or his Visa account. What legal recourse might he have? How likely is he to
succeed? Even if he
prevailed against awesomeodds.com, what challenges would he face in
recovering his money?
d) You are an
attorney for a banking association and are asked to represent Paypal
and
Warren
’s Visa Company (ignore the
professional responsibility issue). What causes of action might
Warren
have against Paypal or Visa
and what defenses do the companies have? Might they be liable
for facilitating the money transfer to a potentially illegal
gambling site? Could
Paypal or Visa have a countersuit against
Warren
for
using them for his gambling and do they have any policies against
gambling that are enforceable?
Online Music Infringement
Cary Dapper (CD) is a
college student whose
passion for digital music
has taken priority over his
studies and the weekly
parties in his dorm. CD
decides that he wants to
bring his eclectic taste in
music to a broad audience.
During a particularly
raucous party, CD borrows a
bunch of compact discs from
his dorm buddies. He rips
a pile of both his own and
the borrowed compact discs
onto an external computer
hard drive and by the end of
the evening he has almost
filled up the 120 gigabyte
drive. CD’s roommate, Harry
Host (HH) returns early the
next morning from the party,
bleary eyed and not eager to
return to classes.
In addition to his beer
bottle cap collection, HH
also has a lot of computer
equipment, and uses one of
his larger computers as a
server and internet gateway
for himself and his friends.
After sharing a breakfast of
leftover pizza and fish
sticks from the night
before, CD starts playing
some of his newly ripped
music collection and asks HH
if he could use HH’s server
to start a webcasting
service, and HH quickly
agrees.
CD’s online webcasts are
created from the music CD
ripped the night before and
are featured on his site “Caryscooltunes.com’. He doesn’t play the same
artist more than once an
hour and avoids announcing
any songs in advance. He
pays the statutory
webcasting royalty out of
his unused beer money. Caryscooltunes.com
becomes popular and it is
consuming a lot of HH’s
bandwidth, slowing his
servers and CD’s pile of
beer money is quickly
shrinking. HH tells CD that
he is going to enhance the
service in order to start
generating revenue. HH adds
animated images on the site
which are synchronized to
CD’s webcast and starts
selling home made t-shirts
with album cover images
through links on the page In order to preserve some of
HH’s bandwidth, CD comes up
with a program that users
can download from
caryscooltunes.com for
$14.99 and capture the
webcast on their home
computers late at night and
then play them at their
convenience during the day
either on their computer or
on a portable MP3 player.
The scheme turns out to be
very popular. HH sells
quite a few t-shirts and CD
has sold hundreds of
downloads of his program.
The Composers and Musicians
Association (CAPA)
represents thousands of
artists, including many who
are featured on CD’s webcast
and HH’s t-shirts. CAPA is
not happy about the site and
believes that the artists’
rights are being infringed
and they are entitled to
more than the statutory
webcasting royalty. CAPA
starts sending nasty letters
and is threatening to sue.
a) You are an attorney
retained by CD. CD has
gotten several angry letters
from CAPA threatening to sue
on the basis of copyright
infringement since they
don’t think that he has
complied with the webcasting
requirements. They are also
threatening to sue on the
basis of CD’s software that
is he is selling on the
site. What causes of action
could CAPA have and what
defenses might CD have?
What would you advise your
client to do?
b) You represent CAPA. What
causes of action might they
have against CD and HH on
behalf of the artists that
CAPA represents and how
likely are they to succeed?
c) You represent HH. HH
thinks that he has a strong
defense because he was
acting as CD’s internet
service provider (ISP) and
that provides him with a
shield against infringement
claims. If CAPA sues HH for
copyright infringement,
would the ISP safe harbor
provision of the DMCA
(Digital Millennium
Copyright Act) help him at
all and what other causes of
action might CAPA have?
What defenses would HH have
and how would you advise
him?
Privacy
Suffolk PCs, a Massachusetts
company, decides
that the way to profit from its web site is to have an I.P.O..
The day the company went public, the stock rose from $10 per share to $50
per share, making all of the employees rich and happy. The I.P.O. also
brought a lot of money into Suffolk PCs coffers and they engage in a
judicious marketing campaign to increase sales. Suffolk PCs has promising
earnings and both the shareholders and the company are happy after the
first quarter, with the stock rising to $80 per share.
The second quarter looks just
as promising as the first. Soon, however, the stock price starts to dip,
even though the overall stock market has been growing. Prices start
dropping from $80 per share to $30 within just a few weeks. A worried
shareholder calls the investor relations department and asks if the rumors
are true about the C.F.O. and his loathsome disease or the web server that
is run by hamsters running in a wheel? Some diligent research reveals a few
very nasty postings on some of the investor sites on the web. Many of them
were started by "rstuffisbetter@stinkycomputers.com" and
"rumormonger@shortseller.com." Unfortunately, both return
addresses were false and do not leave you with any real clues.
The stock price continues to
tumble and Suffolk PCs corporate counsel decides that it is time to take
serious action. He subpoena's the investor sites for the identity of people
making the false, disparaging postings. The little that the web sites
reveal is that the people making the postings are in Canada
. The site has a
disclaimer that expressly disclaims liability for anything posted by third
parties
a) You are corporate
counsel for Suffolk PCs. What legal action can you take against the web
sites that hosted the postings? Can you compel them to reveal the
identities? What causes of action do you have against the people who posted
the false rumors, which sent the stock tumbling? Can you sue someone who posted
something from Canada
? If you do not
have recourse against the web host or those who posted the rumors, what can
you do online to mitigate the damages? Do you have any potential liability
to shareholders since the stock has taken such a beating?
b) You are the
content provider that hosts the investment postings that had the rumors
about Suffolk PCs. Should you reveal the identity of those who posted the
false rumors? Do you have an obligation to maintain the privacy of those
who post messages? What are the long-term implications to your site if you
do reveal the names. What are the potential causes
of action against you for the postings? Is there anything that you can do
to help mitigate damages?
c) You are
"rstuffisbetter@stinkycomputers.com" and "rumormonger@shortseller.com."
What causes of action do you expect that Suffolk PCs might have against
you? What defense could you raise? Can you compel the content provider to
keep your name private? Would you have a cause of action if the content
provider reveals your identity? Can you avoid the lawsuit since you posted
the rumors from Canada
? Is there
anything that you can do to mitigate damages?
Professional Responsibility
Charlie Chatter, esq. is an
avid Internet surfer. Charlie recently passed the Massachusetts
bar exam and set
up shop soon after swearing in. He has not been able to bring in as many
clients for his general solo practice as he expected, so he spends much of
his time perusing the latest online offerings. Charlie realized that he
might be able to enhance his client base through the Internet. He sets up a
web site at "www.greatlawyer.com." The web site has general
information about how to contact Charlie and also a few bold claims:
"I've never lost a case," and "none of my clients has been
unhappy with my advice or my fees." One little item that Charlie
forgot to mention was that he never had a case, nor any clients.
Charlie soon discovers the
magic of chat rooms and decides that they might be a great place to find
some clients. He notices the dialogue in the chat room called "married
but miserable." Charlie thought that he might have a great solution
for users of the chatroom and posts the following:
"Don't be unhappy any longer - I can help you get a quick and easy
divorce - visit my web site at www.greatlawyers.com."
A few days after his posting,
Charlie gets a call from Patty Prenup in
California
. Patty is tempted
by Charlie's advertisement and wants to know if Charlie can help her get a
divorce. Throwing caution to the wind, Charlie is eager to be retained by
his first clients and tells Patty that he can help her for just $200. They
correspond via e-mail to resolve the details and fill out the paper work
via fax.
Soon after she is divorced,
Patty realizes that her ex-husband got most of the assets, even though she
had been supporting him for several years. The ex-husband also got title to
their house and full custody of their dog, Pookie.
When Patty mentioned this to a friend who is in law school, the friend
advised Patty that Charlie may not have done everything that he should
have.
a) You are Patty. Do
you have any recourse against Charlie for his ad in the chat room or his web
site? What about the fact that he is only licensed in Massachusetts
? Did Charlie
create an unjustified expectation about his services? What causes of action
would you have?
b) You are Charlie.
Soon after you help Patty wrap up her divorce, you get a message from the
Massachusetts Board of Professional Responsibility regarding your web site
and chat room posting. What might they object to? Do any of the newer rules
(10/99) of professional responsibility give you more leeway in terms of
client solicitation? What about advising a client in California
- could that
cause a problem? Finally, what causes of action do you expect that Patty
might pursue against you?
c) You are the
Massachusetts Board of Professional Responsibility. What course of action
should you take against Charlie? Do the new rules of professional
responsibility give him more freedom in advertising? Should he be
advertising on a chatroom? What about his domain
name and the content of his web site? Do you have any recourse against him
for advising a California
client? Can you
take any action against him for his handling of Patty's case before she
complains?
SPAM
Suffolk PCs wants to take
advantage of e-mail marketing. They set up a page on their web site,
allowing consumers to opt in to their e-mailing list to learn of upcoming
specials. Peter Cates (P.C.) is an avid online computer shopper and signs
up to be on the Suffolk PC e-mailing list. Before long, there were over
30,000 names on Suffolk
's e-mailing
database. Suffolk PCs hires Sales Promotions And Marketing (SPAM) to create
and execute an effective e-mail marketing campaign based on the list. SPAM
let Suffolk
know that they
had managed the e-mail campaigns of several e-commerce businesses.
The planned e-mail campaign
used Suffolk PCs in the return address and had a subject line of
"Special deals at Suffolk PCs." The content listed a few specials
and had links back to the Suffolk PC web site. SPAM transposed a few digits
while creating Suffolk PCs e-mail ad, so a $419 monitor special actually
said $149 in the ad. SPAM also upgraded their e-mailing software to better
serve clients like Suffolk
. Before
Suffolk
, client's
e-mailing campaigns never exceeded 5,000 names. Unfortunately, SPAM's programmer did not realize that the new software
had a few major changes and the e-mailing did not go quite as planned. P.C.
and several other people were barraged by over 1,000 duplicate messages
each. The mailing lists also got a little tangled and some people on other
'opt out / do not mail' lists were inadvertently e-mailed with
Suffolk
's ad. Soon P.C.
and other recipients had jammed e-mail boxes, filled with Suffolk PC's ads.
Suffolk PCs faced a customer
service nightmare. Their phones would not stop ringing from recipients of
the ad. Some people wanted to know where they could get the $149 monitors,
since they were listed for $419 on the web site. Others complained that
their mailboxes were jammed. Some complained that they were specifically on
a "do not mail" list and should never have received an e-mail ad
in the first place. A few Internet Service Providers called since their
servers were being overwhelmed by Suffolk
's e-mail. The
ISPs were threatening to filter out any future e-mail from Suffolk PCs
because they were now on a list of known junk e-mailers.
a) You are in house
counsel for Suffolk PCs. What kind of recourse do you have against SPAM?
What will you do to mend your relationship with your customers? What about
the monitor advertised for $149 which should have been $419? What do you
expect in terms of potential liability from the recipients of the e-mail
and what can you do to reduce your exposure? Do the ISPs have any potential
cause of action against you?
b) You are an
attorney retained by SPAM. You learned of the problems with the e-mailing
campaign and have been unable to get through to someone at Suffolk PCs.
What do you anticipate as your client's potential liability for the
e-mailing campaign? Does your client have any liability for the typo in the
monitor price? What about liability from ISPs? Do you have any recourse
against the software company or your programmer? What legal steps can your
take in the future to avoid exposure for this type of problem?
c) You are P.C. Your
e-mail server is overwhelmed by the Suffolk PCs e-mailing. You cannot
access critical correspondence, nor can you send out messages. Your ISP is
threatening to deactivate your account since you gave out your e-mail
address to a spammer. What legal recourse do you have against Suffolk PCs?
Against SPAM? Against your ISP for not filtering the messages and for
threatening to deactivate your account? When you finally open one of the
messages, the $149 monitor price looks appealing, but you are disappointed
to find that it is listed at $419 on Suffolk PCs web site. Can you insist
on the $149 price?
Taxation
In
1998, co-founders Charlie Brown and Lucy Coy, along with four employees,
launched New York Personal Computers (NPC), a C Corporation, with its
headquarters at 6th Avenue, New York,
NY.Within two years, NPC had achieved phenomenal
growth, with revenues in excess of $4 billion dollars in 2000.NPC owned 65%
of the Northeast and Canadian PC market and employed 4,000 professionals in
the United States and Canada.
NPC
sells and distributes custom built PCs and it’s own proprietary security
software through its own retail stores, catalogs, and third-party retail
stores like Circuit City and CompUSA.In order to
expand NPC’s existing client base and compete
against the likes of DELL, Gateway Computers, and Amazon.com on a global
level, Charlie and Lucy decided that it was time for NPC to formally engage
in electronic commerce and expand their operations into the European and
Asian markets.
Charlie
and Lucy have formally requested that NPC’s Board
of Directors allow NPC to establish four commercial websites.Each
website would target a particular country/region.The
four targeted countries include the United States, Canada, France and Japan.With respect to France and Canada, Charlie and
Lucy propose that the NPC does not open regional offices in those
locations, rather that they contract with local ISPs to lease a server in
each jurisdiction that can host their commercial website.For
the time being, Charlie and Lucy suggest that all online orders should be
fulfilled from either their Canadian or US distribution centers.In
the event that NPC is able to attain reasonable growth and profitability in
the European and Asian markets, within the first year then plans could be
made to open small satellite offices in both Paris and Tokyo.
a) You are an
attorney representing NPC. The CEO has asked you for tax planning advice to
decide what the tax implications would be for having a website in four different international jurisdictions.Discuss
whether or not there are any tax issues, if so, where.Additionally,
discuss the tax implications to the website customers.Also
focus on the tax consequences of only distributing products from the U.S.
and Canada
.
b) Charlie walks
into your office and thinks that perhaps NPC should consider setting up all
of the servers in Bermuda.Charlie suggests that
since Bermuda is a tax haven – then by having the servers there – NPC would
be absolved from paying any taxes for any transactions.How
would you advise him to proceed from a legal perspective to best protect
NPC. Even though Charlie came to you for tax/legal advice, what business
questions would you suggest that Charlie ponder and why? Assuming that the
idea is still a flop, can Charlie do anything to
minimize NPC’s potential tax liability?
c) Lucy wants NPC to
consider not only selling products on the website but also IT consulting services.Discuss what the tax implications for a
company are with respect to selling products and services from both a U.S.
and International perspective.Given the targeted
countries, should NPC consider another location in order to get a more
favorable tax treatment.
3. Outline of Research
Paper
Your outline is due in class on
February 9, 2008. The outline should elaborate on the issues that you will
be discussing in more detail, what sub-issues you are going to examine and
the sources selected for your research.
4.
Presentations
Every member of the group will
present an argument based on their paper for fifteen minutes. The argument
will consist of a very brief description of the facts followed by the cause
of action / potential liability and defenses and finally the analysis of
why you should prevail.
Be prepared to present your
arguments in class using a presentation software application like Powerpoint. The class will then briefly discuss the
arguments and decide which party should prevail. Your grade for the
presentation depends on your analysis and presentation, not on whether the
class decides you are the prevailing party. After your presentation, you
should take the feedback from your audience and make any final adjustments
to your paper.
5. Final Date
Research Paper is Due
Your research paper is due one
week after you make your class presentation. Please hand in two copies of
your paper as well as a diskette containing your paper, which describes the
type of word processing tool you used.
F. Final Grade
Several factors will go into
determining your final grade, including the quality and degree of
difficulty of: class attendance, class participation, weekly assignments,
class presentation, including assistance to other students, and the
research paper.
|